Review

1. What kinds of things are reviewed in newspapers and magazines?
Normally, the reviews appeared in newspapers and magazines discuss artistic films, books, records, plays, music concerts ... There are many other issues of which could be written reviews, but usually these items are called "opinion piece".

2. How much are you influenced by a review? Would a good review encourage you to go and see a film? Would a bad review stop you buying a book?
I usually read the same writers, because I think it's something personal, as the opinion of each individual, it's normal that people have their favorite author. In some ways, they influence me, because I see the film differently and also quite often coincides with the opinion of the writer. And since books are more expensive than films, a bad review can make me not to buy a book, or at least read it.

Now look at the information about writing reviews. Reviews usually include the following elements:
- introduction to catch reader's interest
- background information
- a brief account of what is being reviewed
- any general comments (either positive or negative)
- personal opinion and recommendation

Read the review of Edward Simpson's below. Which element is missing?
I think the review lacks of an introduction to catch the reader's interest. The article begins directly with the background information.

Now answer the following questions.
1. How would you describe the style of the review - formal, informal or a mixture?
I think it's a mixture, since it uses formal terms, but in an informal way that everyone can understand.
2. Why does the the reviewer include direct speech?
To reach the reader in a more natural way, and also to clearly display that is a personal opinion.
3. How does the reviewer catch the reader's interest in the beginning?
He says something about the family of Edward, to show him in a more closely way, and to identify the reader with the artist.
4. In which part of the review does the reviewer include
a. a description of the painting?
Paragraph 2: “He enjoys painting animals, especially dogs…”, “He uses primary colours…”
b. his own opinion?
Paragraph 3: “I was profoundly moved […] I think his exhibition is well worth a look. ”
c. general comments?
Paragraph 2: “…his approach is simple and direct…”, “…his pictures would add charm to any living room.”

Competition entry

As this is a contest, we have to think that the main function of the competition entry must be that we win that competition. Therefore, I think that is important to emphasize why we want to participate in the contest, and why we believe we are the best candidates for the award.

So in my opinion, I would do the structure of the competition entry in five paragraphs. In the first, I would highlight why I write the letter, why I like to make an English course, and why I wish it were that course specifically.

In the following three paragraphs, I would give answers to the questions they posed. First, I would speak of the things I like when I study English, both personal aspirations, as the things I like doing in class. Then I would speak a little about the opportunities I have to learn English outside of class, both in leisure time, as in other training activities I may have. And finally, I would comment how I can apply in the future what I learn in the course and all my knowledge of English in general.

In conclusion, in the fifth and last paragraph, I would talk about why I should win the award and why I deserve to participate in that English course.

Finally, I think the language should be informal, since the topic of the competition permits it, but also, it must be educated, because it is a letter to be read by a jury and it is important to give an image of seriousness.